- Home
- Property Investment
- Why a property crash is not likely
Why a property crash is not likely
- By Michael Yardney
- Published 18/06/2008
- Property Investment
Michael Yardney
is director of Metropole - Property Investment Strategists and a highly regarded property commentator. He is the author of the best seller - "How to Grow a Multi Million Dollar Property Portfolio - in your spare time" and co -author of "All You Need To Know About Buying & Selling Your home."
www.metropole.com.au
The good news...
A recent survey in The Economist Magazine suggested that Australia has the most over valued residential property in the world. Once again they predict a property crash in Australia, as do a number of commentators
This makes for scary reading and I understand why many home owners and investors are nervous, but a property crash is not on the cards for Australia.
Sure our property boom is over - but that doesn't mean we're going to have a property crash.
There is no doubt that property markets have a lot to contend with this year. Apart from rising interest rates, our property markets had to deal with a global credit crunch, the US sub prime crisis, a US economy heading into recession, the stock market down turn, plummeting housing affordability, unprecedented rental supply shortages and lenders tightening their belts.
So it is not surprising that one questions whether Australia's property market can survive all of these blows or will it suffer the same fate that is happening overseas?
The recent USA National Association of Realtors house price survey recorded an average 7.7% drop in property values for the year of March. This is the biggest on record since 1982. In some states, including California and Florida, property values have plummeted by up to 30%. There are even reports that some financiers are repossessing homes and then asking the owners to stay on rent free just to protect the property from vandals.
Property values have also crashed in Britain, but not to the same extent as the USA. Britain is also suffering from the fallout of the American sub prime crisis with lenders severely restricting funding for investment properties.
So…... why do I think The Economist and other property commentators have got it wrong?
Firstly, I could say The Economist was wrong when it made similar predictions 2 years ago. At that time they forecast a property collapse in Australia, yet property values in most of our capital cities have increased by ten, fifteen and in many cases over twenty percent in the last year alone. Of course a counter argument could be: " Well all this means is that we are now in for a bigger crash!"
I believe the doom-sayers have got it wrong because they don't understand the difference between the fundamentals of the Australian property market and those overseas and the difference between this property cycle and previous property downturns.
In America many residential housing loans are "non-recourse loans." In other words lenders don't have to personally guarantee their loans. They can walk away from their loan commitments, leave their house to the lender and the bank can't make them pay for any shortfall when (and if) they sell the property.
This is why you will often see different investment strategies used by property investors in America where the mortgage stays with the house and not with the borrower. 
Obviously, here in Australia you can't just walk away from your loan. If you can't make the re-payments, the banks may take over your property and the day of reckoning will eventually come when you will have to pay the bank for any shortfall they have after repossessing your property.
Our local housing market is underpinned by the fact that 70% of Australians own their own homes or are paying them off. Considering the strength of our property markets over the last few years, unless they bought recently or over committed, many Australians have a large amount of equity in their homes and a significant proportion have no debt against their homes.
We are investing in a market dominated by non investors. As opposed to shares investors, home owners don't just sell their house when the news is bad or property market is flat.
If you think about it, at any one time only about 5% of property owners are going to need to buy or sell their homes. This means the majority of property owners are not really affected by what is happening to property values as they are in it for the long term. They won't need to sell their properties if conditions in the property market get worse. This is obviously very different to the stock market, where as the share prices plummet, more investors have to sell to cover their margin calls accelerating the drop in share prices.
There are many other strong fundamentals that should prevent our property markets from crashing. Our market conditions are very different to previous property downturns.
Currently we have a robust economy, strong population growth, changing demographics, a huge deficiency of properties for both owners-occupiers and tenants and rising building costs. All of this points to a short downturn, with strong fundamentals underpinning the next stage of the property cycle.
In previous property market downturns we had an economy in recession, while today our economy is strong and buoyant.
In previous property market downturns immigration fell, as people didn't want to come to a country with an ailing economy. This time 'round Australia is experiencing a population boom, with the current rate of population growth the highest in almost 20 years.
Recently released Australian Bureau of Statistics figures reveal that the Australian population increased by 331,872 new residents or 1.6% over the 2007 calendar year. Our rate of population growth has not been this high since 1989. In general, highly skilled cashed up business migrants who are keen to buy houses are coming here. Many of these migrants are from Generation X or Y and are balancing our aging natural population. This is a good thing and something the ailing property markets in the USA and Britain would be desperately jealous of.
At the same time our changing demographics, with an increase in single and two people households, means that we need more dwellings for the same number of people.
In previous property market downturns we experienced an oversupply of properties. Over- enthusiastic builders constructed too many apartments and excited property investors put too many new properties onto the letting market. This increased supply of stock in the presence of decreasing demand meant that both property prices and rentals had to fall.
This time round we have a deficiency of stock in the presence of strong demand.
If we combine the low number of new constructions with the shortage of available property supply, accentuated by higher building costs and banks tightening finance for new development, we have a volatile mixture that can only lead to a much higher cost for the next round of new dwellings to be built.
What about all the news of rising interest rates and mortgage stress?
In previous property slumps we had low employment. Rising unemployment with no wages coming into the household meant families were forced to sell their homes. Today we have full employment, which means that even though there are higher loan repayments stretching family budgets, with household incomes rising it's not likely that owners will walk away from their homes.
Another factor suggesting this property downturn will be short lived is the strongly rising rentals that property investors are receiving all around the country. Rental increases usually lead to rising property values as investors come back into the market chasing more robust yields.
Putting all this together, it is unlikely that a property crash is on the cards.
On the contrary, our property markets are behaving normally; working their way through the individual property cycles. Within each state the property markets are fragmented with some suburbs, in particular the more affluent inner city and bayside suburbs, still performing strongly, while other suburbs will languish.
Understanding these cycles means that there are great opportunities out there for property investors who are selective and have the ability to think long term.
at a very special price! …until sold out – only 5 sets available. Buy our best selling Mentored by the Property Masters 9 CD set & receive the How & Where to Invest 3 DVD set For an extra $50 !SAVE $150! This is a once only offer so don’t miss out! Click here now to get these two great sets at this fantastic price!
Our two best selling audio-visual programs
ATTEND A FREE BOARDROOM PROPERTY BRIEFING
Click here to find out more about Metropole's free Saturday morning property briefings - held in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Perth.
Join us as our buyer's agents show you how they pick top performing investment properties. Click here for details or to register your interest.
Educate your self and become a more informed investor.
Click here NOW and check out our range of property books, CD's and DVD's.
Save $$$ on our book bundles. Buy securely online and we'll post your order overnight
Spread The Word
12 Responses to "Why a property crash is not likely" 
|
said this on 20 Jun 2008 1:45:18 PM EST
Michael you are spot on with your comments as alway's. I have just returned from DUBAI, in which the property market is booming. But that is more to do with the BIG MONEY at hand. But Australian residential property is solid as per your artical. Cheers Graham
|
|
said this on 26 Jun 2008 12:50:34 AM EST
Alot is made of the increased population intake yet not long after after the last big population increase in 1989 property prices were moribund for years. Overvalued housing markets in Spain, Ireland, Holland, US, UK and China are rapidly changing direction. Australia has never had a commodities boom that did not end in a bust. Rent rises are capped by demographic change where people quickly change their behaviour (eg sharing houses, staying home, moving) when rents rise. Most of all this article mentions o/s and economic factors but maintains a tone that suggests property cycles here are not really affected by macro factors - not so. In the US only months ago many were saying housing would have a soft landing over there, and a recession was not on the cards. Wrong. Further the article says that at any time only about 5% of property owners are going to need to buy or sell and the majority won't. Well that seems to make the obvious point that the market is potentially driven by necessity which is as potent a price lowering as much as increasing factor. Australian property is underpinned by capital and the cost of capital has increased dramatically and more is on the cards. The change is starting and looks like continuing. Cash returns at 8% are looking much better than property right now.
|
|
said this on 20 Jun 2008 6:06:10 PM EST
Good to see a well written factual article on property Micheal
|
|
said this on 21 Jun 2008 6:13:09 PM EST
Michael
Sometime back you were commenting that we may be at the beginning of a new property cycle heading upwards. Your property buying agency was also saying the same thing. Now the tack has changed. The bottom-line is that fundamentals do always reassert themselves and there is going to be a period of consolidation if not correction. Lets hope the commodities boom does not peter out and take down the property markets with it. Fingers crossed. manzur |
|
said this on 22 Jun 2008 9:09:44 PM EST
Thanks Michael for your well researched commentary on property directions and conditions. As a professional in the property industry I personally see the fear and sleepless nights that are caused by uninformed media stories. I do, however, think that we have seen the best days of property investing and care needs to be taken from now on to maximise rental returns and limit reliance on increasing debt.
I have several clients with large portfolios who have reached maximum exposure levels with lenders and are having to sell property because they can no longer borrow to keep capitalising their interest payments. When availability to credit freezes, as we are seeing now, highly geared growth strategies can come undone. Our principle strategy is now focussed on creating positive cashflow with high growth property through holiday letting. In Byron Bay we are achieving over 10% rental return on holiday homes that have averaged 14% growth per annum over ten years. Now that growth is weakened, returning to the fundamental business acumen of creating cash profit will recession-proof your property portfolio while waiting for the tide of growth to turn. With resources like oil and minerals reaching critical supply levels for a global population needing more than possible production, inflation is becoming a real issue throughout the world. While this is good for mineral rich countries like Australia, it also means that interest rates will remain high for some time and this will impact property investment costs into the near future. Like Bill Zheng, I see a fundamental shift in the economic fabric of the world and believe that the way we create wealth will be deeply challenged if we do not pay attention to the real underlying supply and demand fabric between limited natural resources and the growing human population. Oil is the first major indicator of what is in store. How we use our wealth and resources to aid and better our fellow human beings is in my judgement a better indicator of our real worth in these changing times. Many thanks Vincent Selleck 888 Wealth Creation Byron Bay NSW |
|
said this on 14 Jul 2008 12:41:40 PM EST
Vincent, thanks for clarifying the issue of growth over cashflow. Yesterday our most recent renovation failed to sell at auction, with significant interest, but at nearly $100K under our agreed sell price. Although our agent is keen for us to get out of our suburb and move into what will be potentially better capital growth, our cash reserve will take a slamming, leaving us with limited funds for future purchases.
We have decided to batten down the hatches until the sale of our property at a more reasonable level. To support our mortgage we are reconfiguring one side of our house and will let to uni students (a huge market, 52 weeks of the year, in our area.) If the market turns, we will sell and move on to our next reno. If the market doesn't turn we will be able to pay our mortgage and survive. We now know we must be more prepared for these market deviations and consider the provision for subletting in all future renovations, (it also could be a great selling point.) Thanks, Sandie. |
|
said this on 23 Jun 2008 10:41:38 PM EST
Hi There, I think the property market is stable thanks to the mining boom in Australia,
Im experiencing first hand the effects of more demand than supply in the rental market with the average 3 bedroom house renting for $1500 per week in the Pilbra WA. |
|
said this on 26 Jun 2008 10:27:14 AM EST
Thanks Michael. Your comments make a lot of sense. You're a champ!
|
|
said this on 27 Jun 2008 3:36:01 PM EST
Michael,
Unfortunately your comments don't line up with what is actually happening in the property market. I went to a bulk property auction (at the Broncos Club held by Ray White) about 18 months ago and then again last night in Brisbane. Let me tell you the mood was distinctly different. Bidding was very subdued and number of people attend was pretty phathetic. Most properties did not reach their reserves. High interest rates and negative sentiment is beginning to bite, and this is being reflected in much lower sales prices. |
|
said this on 27 Jun 2008 4:53:50 PM EST
Is there a shortage of land in Australia, quite simply no way. This is the argument the Japanese used for their property prices in the 80's before house prices dropped 50% and are still cheaper
Are you buying your property at the top of a boom? Australia haven't had a recession for well over a decade, unemployment and interest rates are near record lows. So the risks are firmly to the downside, with potential upside gains very limited The federal govt and ato has been spending a lot of time also in the last 18 months re-assessing negative gearing. I guess the biggest problem I see with property now is everybody thinks its a sure thing, this is exactly the type of thinking that causes manias. I think a lot of Australians need to seriously take a step back and see what they are really paying 500k for(the average house price). Are they only paying 500k cause they think it will be worth 550k next year, eg the greater fool theory where you beleive you can sell it to a greater fool than yourself at a higher price.If thats the way you think, then you would be happy and maybe a lot of others are now to buy that 500k house tomorrow for 800k. So are you buying that house as its yield is good or for capital growth? And do you really have a fair idea of value or will you pay anything cause the price is rising. The last boom was dot com, people paid any price for stocks with low or no yield under the assumption it was a new paradigm and they would be able to make capital gains,is property the same, have the rules changed and are we once again in a new paradigm? |
|
said this on 05 Aug 2008 9:04:13 PM EST
Michael,
So "The Economist" got it wrong in predicting a crash - what signs would, in your opinion, signal a crash? Thanks. |


Author/Admin)




